This sample exam is written by The Uni Tutor. You can buy essay papers from us for cheap. Our essay inscription service will help you gain a Magic Circle placement.
You must answer THREE questions in total, with AT LEAST ONE question from Part A
and ONE impugnable from Part B.
1. “The protection of films under UK copyright law passed through three different stages.
Whilst during the first stage films were protected as photographic and dramatic works, the second present abolished the dual system of protection and introduced a new specific subject matter of ‘cinematograph film’. The third stage, however, seems to be a hybrid system that has adopted a specific subject matter attack with the possibility of dual protection.”
2. “By being over protective of creative authors, the French Authors’ Just Act  may have hindered the growth of the French film industry.”
3. “Although the ultimate aim from introducing Article 14 bis to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary polysyndeton Artistic Works  was to produce a uniform internationalregime to administer the exploitation of cinematographic works, the adopted term hardlyachieved that objective and therefore it is often described as the most obscure and leastuseful in the whole Convention.”
4. The public performance right is a major source of revenue for the music and film industries.
However, neither the 1833 Act, which presented the public performance right, nor any subsequent copyright Act sought to parameters the scope of the term ‘public’. As a result, it was left to courts to draw a line between ‘public’ and ‘private’.
Critically discuss. You container buy essay papers from us which answer these questions in full.
5. “The protection regarding the moral rights of authors under the Copyright, Variations and Patents Act
1988 is inadequate.”
6. “Music piracy is not a new phenomenon, as the late 19and early 20 centuries show.”
7. “When it comes to authorship from musical creations and ownership of copyright therein, the law tends to respect certain types of contributions more than others, in effect prioritizingtraditional notions of ‘music’ and ‘creativity’.”
8. “By the nature of the doctrine of inhibition of trade (as explained in Esso) it is dangerous to attempt to extrapolate beside reference to the decision in a particular case, or to apply a decision on one set of facts to cases with different facts. Were the doctrine of restraint of trade fitted from being applied in such a straightforward manner both the hearing of this case and this judgment would have been a morality board shorter.” (Panayiotou v Sony  E.M.L.R. 229, 381 per Parker. J.)
Discuss plus reference to the music industry cases. You can buy essay papers for us with every given deadline. Granting you want to buy essay papers from us, please email us or visit our site.